What brand of large excavator is good? Popular brands and purchasing guides across the Internet
Recently, the choice of large excavator brands has become a hot topic in the field of construction machinery. Whether it is the increase in infrastructure projects or the active second-hand market, consumers' attention to excavator performance, price and after-sales service has increased significantly. This article combines the hot data of the entire network in the past 10 days to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of mainstream brands and provide you with a structured purchasing guide.
1. Top 5 popular excavator brands in 2024
| Ranking | Brand | market share | Popular models | Price range (10,000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caterpillar | 23.5% | CAT 320 | 80-120 |
| 2 | Komatsu | 18.7% | PC200-8 | 75-110 |
| 3 | Sany Heavy Industry | 15.2% | SY215C | 50-85 |
| 4 | XCMG | 12.8% | XE215DA | 45-80 |
| 5 | Volvo | 9.5% | EC210B | 85-130 |
2. Comparative analysis of core performance
| Brand | Fuel consumption (L/h) | Maximum digging force (kN) | Failure rate | Value retention rate (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar | 18-22 | 138 | Industry lowest | 75% |
| Komatsu | 16-20 | 142 | low | 72% |
| Sany Heavy Industry | 20-25 | 135 | in | 65% |
| XCMG | 22-26 | 130 | in | 60% |
| Volvo | 15-19 | 145 | extremely low | 78% |
3. Analysis of key purchasing indicators
1.Adaptability to working environment: Caterpillar is the first choice for mining operations, Komatsu or Sany are recommended for municipal engineering, and Volvo's reinforced structural design is considered for extreme working conditions.
2.cost performance curve: The initial purchase cost of domestic Sany and Xugong is 30-40% lower than that of imported brands, but the total cost of the five-year use cycle needs to be calculated.
3.Degree of intelligence: The latest industry data shows that models equipped with remote monitoring systems can reduce maintenance costs by 15%, with Cat® Connect and Komatsu Conchas systems leading the way.
4. After-sales service system score
| Brand | Service station coverage | Parts supply speed | Technical support response | Overall rating (5-point scale) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar | 98% | Within 24 hours | 2 hours response | 4.9 |
| Komatsu | 95% | Within 48 hours | 4 hours response | 4.7 |
| Sany Heavy Industry | 90% | Within 72 hours | 6 hours response | 4.3 |
| XCMG | 88% | Within 72 hours | 8 hours response | 4.1 |
| Volvo | 92% | Within 36 hours | 3 hours response | 4.6 |
5. Expert advice
1. PrioritizeEquipment attendancewithinvestment return cycle, Caterpillar has the lowest overall cost despite its high unit price.
2. For users with limited budgets, the search volume of Sany SY485H (50-ton class) has soared by 200% in the past 10 days, reflecting the increasing market recognition of domestic large-scale digging.
3. Pay attention to the products launched by various brandsTrade-in policy, Komatsu’s current replacement subsidy can reach up to 20% of the equipment’s residual value.
4. Second-hand market data shows that second-hand Carter 320GC with working hours between 4,000 and 6,000 hours has the best value retention rate, and the turnover cycle is 40% faster than similar products.
From the above structured data analysis, we can see that choosing an excavator brand requires comprehensive consideration of operational needs, budget range, and service network. It is recommended to inspect the equipment on site and conduct a test drive, while making decisions based on the latest industry white paper data.
check the details
check the details
en
